🔗 Share this article

At least 11 states and two territories have agreed to a new directive from the federal government to eliminate references of transgender issues and the presence of trans and non-binary people from a national sex education initiative, authorities stated.

The administration set a recent cutoff for removing these references, threatening the withdrawal of substantial government funding. Almost every of the complying states have Republican-controlled lawmaking bodies and predominantly Republican state leaders.

Court Battles and Financial Disputes

Sixteen other states and Washington DC have initiated legal action against the administration's demand, arguing it infringes on Congressional authority, which created the $75 million sex education program, known as the PREP initiative.

All states involved in the lawsuit are led by Democrat state executives.

In a late Monday judicial ruling, a federal judge prevented the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which oversees the program, from withholding funding to the suing jurisdictions if they refuse to comply.

“The agency does not demonstrate that the new grant conditions are justified, let alone offer any reasonable explanation, other than pretext, for its actions,” stated Ann Aiken, a federal jurist in Oregon. “HHS provides no evidence that it made factual findings or took into account the statutory objectives.”

Initiative Aims and Federal Review

Prep aims to inform teenagers on positive interactions and how to prevent pregnancy and the transmission of sexually transmitted infections.

In April, the Trump administration demanded all states and territories obtaining program money to submit a version of their educational materials to the department and its agency, the Administration for Children and Families, for a health content assessment.

By late summer, the administration dispatched notices to 46 states and territories, informing them that, during the evaluation, it had discovered “content in the educational programs that fall outside the scope of Prep’s authorizing statute.”

Specifically, the government said it had uncovered evidence of “gender ideology,” a term often used by conservative factions to describe the notion that gender is a fluid social construct and that transgender individuals exist.

Specific Examples of Required Alterations

The government directed one state to remove a curriculum that said: “Adolescents may express themselves in ways that differ from their assigned gender.”

It instructed another state to eliminate a line from a middle school lesson that read: “Individuals regardless of identity need to know how to avoid pregnancy and STDs.”

Additionally, health instructors in many jurisdictions could no longer be told to “demonstrate acceptance and respect for all participants, irrespective of personal characteristics, including race, cultural background, religion, social class, orientation or gender identity,” according to the notices sent to jurisdictions.

Official Statements and Jurisdictional Reactions

“Oversight is imminent,” declared a federal official, interim leader of the ACF office, in a statement. “Government money will not be used to negatively influence of the youth or advance dangerous ideological agendas.”

Several jurisdictions and regions stated they would eliminate the references or had completed the process. These include eleven specific states, as well as the two territories.

Two other states, Alabama and South Dakota, said their Prep curricula never contained the language mentioned in the government's notices.

Effects on Adolescents and Psychological Well-being

Together, these states are home to more than 120,000 transgender individuals aged 13 to 17, based on estimates from a research institute.

“If our goal is to support youth and give them a safe space, I’m not sure why we are stomping on the most vulnerable youth in the population,” commented Cindi Huss, who leads an organization that provides sex education in Tennessee.

“When the government says that there’s something wrong with you and the educators aren’t allowed to tell you things or they have to disclose your identity to family – when you know that that’s not secure – that’s detrimental to psychological well-being.”

Almost 50% of trans and non-binary youth contemplated self-harm in the past year, based on a recent study from a suicide-prevention group. Educational backing for these youths is associated with reduced numbers of attempted suicide, the group discovered.

Previous Actions and Ongoing Disputes

Earlier this year, the federal government instructed a state to cut mentions to gender identity from its Prep curriculum.

When the Democratic-led state refused, the administration revoked its Prep grant, eliminating approximately $12m in federal funding and stopping sex education programs in schools, youth centers and care facilities.

The California health department is challenging the termination. So far, it has been unable to make up for the lost funding.

The Trump administration has also informed educators who obtain money from two other federal sex education initiatives, the $50m Sexual Risk Avoidance Education (SRAE) and the $101m Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program (TPPP), that they cannot teach about “gender-related concepts.”

An early October judicial ruling prevented the administration from altering one program, while the latest ruling prohibits it from modifying the other program in the suing jurisdictions that sued over Prep.

The Administration for Children and Families did not immediately respond to a inquiry.