🔗 Share this article

The iPhone maker could be required to permit rivals to operate separate application platforms on Apple devices across Britain, after a decision from the competition regulator.

This represents a major shift to Apple's infamous "closed system" where applications can only be downloaded from the company's official marketplace.

But the Competition and Markets Authority has classified both the tech giants as having "dominant market position" - indicating they have significant control over smartphone ecosystems.

Regulatory Findings

The CMA said the tech firms "could be restricting innovation and market rivalry".

But the authority clarified it did not "find or assume misconduct" from the firms.

"Mobile applications generates one and a half percent of the British economy and sustains around 400,000 jobs, which is why it's crucial these sectors work well for business," commented a senior official from the CMA.

Around ninety to one hundred percent of British smartphones operate using Apple or Google's mobile platforms, creating what the regulator calls an "effective duopoly".

According to current data, nearly half of British smartphone users use an iPhone - which runs the iOS operating system - with the vast majority of the rest using the Android OS.

Apple's Reaction

The CMA's investigation focused on how prominent the companies' own apps are compared with competitors - as well as their web applications and operating systems.

It is unclear what changes the regulator will seek to implement, but earlier it published guidelines outlining potential measures it could take.

These comprise mandating it to be more straightforward for people to transition between Apple and Android phones, and for both firms to rank apps "fairly and openly" in their marketplaces.

The Cupertino company particularly may be required to allow third-party marketplaces on its devices, and let people to download programs directly from companies' websites.

This would follow comparable regulations in the European Union, which previously took action against the company for anti-competitive behaviour.

Apple cautioned the United Kingdom could face delays to receiving updates - as has occurred in the European Union - which the company attributes to strict rules.

For example, some Apple Intelligence capabilities which have been rolled out in other parts of the world are not accessible in the European market.

"We faces intense rivalry in every market where we operate, and we work tirelessly to create the best products, solutions and user experience," the company said in a release.

"Britain's implementation of European regulations would undermine that, resulting in consumers with reduced data protection and security, slower availability to latest functions, and a fragmented, more complicated user journey."

The Search Giant's Standpoint

Android users can currently use third-party app stores - though commentators say they are not as user-friendly as the company's official application marketplace.

The CMA's roadmap said Google may have to "change the user experience" of downloading apps directly from websites, as well as "eliminate barriers" when using alternative app stores.

"There appears to be no the justification for the current classification," a company policy executive remarked.

The representative said "the majority" of Android users use third-party platforms or download apps straight from a developer's website, and claimed there is a much wider selection of apps available for Android users versus those on iOS products.

"Currently available are 24,000 Android phone models from 1,300 phone manufacturers globally, facing strong rivalry from iOS in the United Kingdom," the spokesperson continued.

Android is an open-source operating system, which means developers can utilize and develop on top of it for free.

The company contends this means it opens up market competition.

But advocacy organizations said curbs on these companies' power in different nations "currently assist businesses to innovate and giving consumers more options".

"The companies' control is now causing real harm by restricting choice for users and competition for businesses," stated a policy expert.